By Lorraine Talbot

Multi-disciplinary in strategy, this comprehensiveВ volume examines English corporation legislations from either a socio-legal and black letter perspective.

Using a contextual and important framework; drawing at the impression of yank legislations and criminal scholarship and a case learn of mutual construction societies’ march to the marketplace and company identification, this publication argues that sleek corporation legislation is formed via economics, ideology and present legislation and that the country of the legislations at anybody time depends upon the consistently moving dynamic among them.

Scrutinizing the firms Act 2006 in-detail and tracing the background of the elemental ideas of corporation legislations, Talbot explores:

  • the doctrine of separate company personality
  • directors’ duties
  • minority security and the doctrine of ultra vires.

Invigorating this a lot studied zone; uncovering the social elements that proceed to notify it and the political nature of the legislations itself, this textbook is a useful source for all these learning corporation law.

Show description

Read or Download Critical Company Law PDF

Best jurisprudence books

Reputation, Celebrity and Defamation Law

Utilizing Robert Post's seminal article 'The Social Foundations of acceptance and the structure' as a place to begin, this e-book argues that the concept that of acceptance adjustments traditionally, reflecting social, political, fiscal, cultural and technological adjustments. It additionally means that the price of an exceptional acceptance isn't immutable and analyses the background and doctrines of defamation legislation within the US and the united kingdom.

Extra resources for Critical Company Law

Example text

Separate corporate personality 25 this chapter and Chapter 3 as creditors in particular must be sure of whom they are dealing with and the liabilities of that person’s members. This is particularly important for small unsecured creditors as more powerful creditors such as banks are likely to require the company’s directors to personally guarantee loans made to the company if the company in question is a small private company. This requirement effectively sets aside separate corporate personality as both the director and the company become liable for the company’s debts.

17 Although the Salomon principle should mean that a company’s assets belonged to the company alone, to apply that in this case would have undermined the purpose and raison d’être of a legal document such as a trade mark. The courts took the view that to give legal effect to the trade mark, the veil between the companies should be pierced to the extent that all companies in the group could use the trade mark to identify their products and activities as part of the Revlon Group. Lord Keith went on to state that the court could only lift the veil if a defendant was using the corporate structure in an attempt to evade limitations imposed on his conduct by law, or such rights or relief against him as third parties already possessed.

The total purchase money of Salomon’s business was £38,782 19s. 7d. and his books were made up by an accountant hired by him. At the time of incorporation the business was solvent although the price that the company was to pay for the business far exceeded the amounts showing in the balance sheet. The nominal capital of the company was £40,000 divided in 40,000 shares of £1 each. The memorandum of association was subscribed to by Aron Salomon, his wife, his daughter and his four sons, who held one share each because this was the minimum requirement under the 1862 Act.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.05 of 5 – based on 12 votes