By Jean Mark and Stanley Peters Gawron

A central target of this booklet is to enhance and follow the location Semantics framework. Jean Mark Gawron and Stanley Peters undertake a model of the idea within which meanings are equipped up through syntactically pushed semantic composition ideas. they supply a considerable remedy of English incorporating remedies of pronomial anaphora, quantification, donkey anaphora, and demanding. The ebook specializes in the semantics of pronomial anaphora and quantification. The authors argue that the ambiguities of sentences with pronouns can't be effectively accounted for with a conception that represents anaphoric relatives merely syntactically; their relational framework uniformly offers with anaphoric kinfolk as relatives among utterances in context. They argue that there's no use for a syntactic illustration of anaphoric kinfolk, or for a concept that debts for anaphoric ambiguities by way of resorting to 2 or extra forms of anaphora. Quantifier scope ambiguities are dealt with analogously to anaphoric ambiguities. This therapy integrates the Cooper shop mechanism with a thought of which means that offers either a traditional atmosphere for it and a resounding account of what, semantically, is happening. Jean Mark Gawron is a researcher for Hewlett Packard Laboratories, Palo Alto. Stanley Peters is professor of linguistics and symbolic structures at Stanford collage and is director of the guts for the research of Language and data.

Show description

Read or Download Anaphora and Quantification in Situation Semantics PDF

Similar logic books

Errors of Reasoning. Naturalizing the Logic of Inference

Blunders of Reasoning is the long-awaited continuation of the author's research of the common sense of cognitive structures. the current concentration is the person human reasoner working below the stipulations and pressures of actual existence with capacities and assets the flora and fauna makes on hand to him.

The Is-Ought Problem: An Investigation in Philosophical Logic

Can OUGHT be derived from IS? This publication provides an research of this prevalent challenge through alethic-deontic predicate good judgment. New during this examine is the leitmotif of relevance: is-ought inferences certainly exist, yet they're all inappropriate in an actual logical experience. New evidence innovations identify this consequence for terribly huge sessions of logics.

Functional and Logic Programming: 5th International Symposium, FLOPS 2001 Tokyo, Japan, March 7–9, 2001 Proceedings

This publication constitutes the refereed complaints of the fifth foreign Symposium on sensible and good judgment Programming, FLOPS 2001, held in Tokyo, Japan in March 2001. The 21 revised complete papers awarded including 3 invited papers have been rigorously reviewed and chosen from forty submissions. The e-book deals topical sections on sensible programming, good judgment programming, practical common sense programming, varieties, application research and transformation, and Lambda calculus.

Extra info for Anaphora and Quantification in Situation Semantics

Example text

Ii) If f : x → y and g : y → z are morphisms so that g f is monic, then f is monic. Dually: (i’) If f : x y and g : y z are epimorphisms, then so is g f : x z. (ii’) If f : x → y and g : y → z are morphisms so that g f is epic, then g is epic. Proof. iii. Exercises. i. Show that C/c (c/(Cop ))op . iii(i). ii. (i) Show that a morphism f : x → y is a split epimorphism in a category C if and only if for all c ∈ C, post-composition f∗ : C(c, x) → C(c, y) defines a surjective function. (ii) Argue by duality that f is a split monomorphism if and only if for all c ∈ C, pre-composition f ∗ : C(y, c) → C(x, c) is a surjective function.

7. 5. i). 5. EQUIVALENCE OF CATEGORIES 31 • and essentially surjective on objects if for every object d ∈ D there is some c ∈ C such that d is isomorphic to Fc. 8. ” A faithful functor need not be injective on morphisms; neither must a full functor be surjective on morphisms. A faithful functor that is injective on objects is called an embedding and identifies the domain category as a subcategory of the codomain; in this case, faithfulness implies that the functor is (globally) injective on arrows.

I) For vector spaces of any dimension, the map ev : V → V ∗∗ that sends v ∈ V to the linear function evv : V ∗ → k defines the components of a natural transformation from the identity endofunctor on Vectk to the double dual functor. To check that the naturality square ev G ∗∗ V V φ  W φ∗∗ ev  G W ∗∗ commutes for any linear map φ : V → W, it suffices to consider the image of a generic vector v ∈ V. By definition, evφv : W ∗ → k carries a functional f : W → k to f (φv). 7(ii) on morphisms, we see that φ∗∗ (evv ) : W ∗ → k carries a functional f : W → k to f φ(v), which amounts to the same thing.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.21 of 5 – based on 30 votes